Share This Page

Member Login / Sign-Up

JD Diversity Login

About This Blogger

JD Diversity is very happy to welcome guest blogger, Paula Edgar, Esq., for the month of June.

Paula Edgar, Esq. is a diversity consultant, owner and principal of PGE LLC and currently serves as the Executive Director for Practicing Attorneys for Law Students Program, Inc. (PALS).  PALS is an organization which is dedicated to providing academic support, career development information and networking opportunities to minority law students and new attorneys.  As Executive Director, she focuses on programming and mentoring to aid in the career development of law students and new attorneys of color. Ms. Edgar is particularly invested in the program as she was a PALS mentee as a law student. 

Prior to becoming the Executive Director, Paula practiced law as a Staff Attorney in the Law Enforcement Division of the New York City Commission on Human Rights.  Recently, Ms. Edgar was a participant in the New York City “Strength Through Diversity” Young Professionals Leadership Program; a program designed to identify and energize emerging community leaders committed to promoting mutual understanding among New York City’s diverse ethnic populations.  Ms. Edgar currently serves on the Board of Directors of Teaching Firms of America Schools, a developing nonprofit focused on creating unique elementary charter schools for low income inner city communities.

Ms. Edgar has served as a panelist and speaker on topics related to diversity in the legal profession, networking and mentoring for law students and young attorneys.  Ms. Edgar received her Bachelor of Arts Degree in Anthropology from California State University (Fullerton) and her Juris Doctorate from the City University of New York School of Law. 

 

CompUSA

 

Troy Davis PDF Print E-mail

alt

by Brian Gilmore

Troy Davis is dead.  Executed in Georgia this past week.  He said over and over he is innocent and though my personal feeling is, he did not kill Officer Mark MacPhail more than two decades ago in Savannah, Georgia; that is not the real issue.

The real issue is the prosecution of Troy Davis, the sentencing, and then the failed appeals for a new trial, reveal again that what must die is the death penalty.  Who dies and who lives? It is like picking the name from a hat.  I could be on death row if I get mistaken for someone one night. Some who have been exonerated spent decades in jail due to false identification, or a corrupt system. That is all they had on Davis in the end: two eyewitnesses, one of which some said was the real killer who had threatened to kill the others if they told the truth.

The other seven eyewitnesses recanted. Four said they police threatened them to get them to finger Davis, according to various media accounts as the fervor over Davis’ impending annihilation loomed in the media.

By the same token, Samuel David Crowe is alive today. In 1988, he brutally murdered Joseph Paia in cold blood.  He was about to be executed in 2008 when the same Georgia Parole Board that sent Troy Davis to his end, saved Crowe.   The Paia family was absolutely crushed by the decision and could not even speak to the media when the decision as announced. Here is what Crowe did to Pala and what he confessed to without any doubt:

“Crowe robbed the lumber store after shooting Pala in the chest. Pala was shot at two more time by Crowe as he was trying to run for his life. Crowe then beat him with a paint can, and poured paint over his face. Thinking he may still be alive, he proceeded to beat him over the head with a crowbar. He fled the scene with $1,160.”

I am not arguing that Crowe should have put to death in 1988. I am here to argue that the state has no business murdering people on my dime or your dime. It suggests that all agree with these arbitrary decisions to kill people, even when there is serious doubt, about guilt. Should Tim McVeigh have been spared?  Yes. How about the DC Sniper who had me buying gas in the crime infested sections of Washington D.C. because I knew the hood was safe from the madness?  Yes.  I think the death penalty should die. I don't like the first murder or the follow-up killing by the state.

As for Davis, the questions will linger. Did Davis have to die because a cop was the victim? Was Davis the person who did it? No one really knows but Davis.    

Jessica Care Moore, the fabulous Detroit poet, said this past week she could not believe it when Davis was actually killed and is afraid for her 5 year old son even more now.  

Pro-death penalty forces might have rejoiced when Davis was killed this past week. But I believe that capitol punishment, as much as Americans love it, has seen better days and will one day be outlawed.  We are just too Old Testament right now. Eye for an eye.  Rome wasn't built in a day.  And it wasn't reformed in a day either. 

 

 
NetWORKING Strategies, Part 3: The How-To PDF Print E-mail

So now that we’ve covered how to navigate your network & how to determine your professional goals, we need to discuss how to actually put networking into action during events. Law students: Remember that your first priority while in law school is to be an excellent student, however you will need to find time to balance your professional aspirations with your schoolwork.  Attorneys: Networking must be incorporated into your daily professional development plan.  In general, but especially in the current economy, networking is mandatory.  Be careful about how you invest your time; the key to successful networking is not only working the meeting in a productive manner, but also making sure that you are going to the right events.

The Approach:

What is your 30 second Bio?   You need to have a quick introduction of yourself that you can use when approaching potential contacts at events.  If you have previously researched the person you are approaching, you can ask a more direct question regarding their past accomplishments, present job, recent article, etc.  Generally the conversation will extend naturally from the open ended question you ask at the end of your intro.  

Student Example:

Hi my name is _______. I am a 1L/2L/3L at ____ Law School.   I am interested in ________.    What area of law do you practice?

Attorney example:

Hello my name is _______.   I am an _______ (associate/law clerk/counsel etc.) at _________.   OR  I am a  recent graduate with an interest in ¬¬¬________.  

At the Event:

Register to read more...
 
NetWORKING Strategies, Part 2 - Determine Your Professional Goals PDF Print E-mail

In order to effectively network, you must determine your career goals.   Have you always wanted to be a judge? A public interest attorney? A law professor? A politician? A law firm partner? Not sure what you plan to do with your law degree?  Goal setting is an integral part of achieving success during law school and beyond.

I encourage first and second year law students who are not sure what they want to do with their law degrees to be open to attending a wide variety of events. Many 1Ls are sure they want to practice in a particular field of law, only to see their goals and interests shift after exposure to other practice areas during the first few semesters of law school. 

Third year law students and attorneys should be more focused in their networking.    While many networking occurs on the fly during impromptu meetings and events, I suggest that students and attorneys have defined goals when deciding what events to attend and who to approach.   

1

Create a plan of attack – Write out your goals. If you have several legal practice area interests, write them out.   Create a document that lists the courses you have taken that relate to each topic, people you have met that practice in the area, events you have attended on the subject etc.    This will be a “living” document that you can frequently update to monitor your progress as you build your network. 

Read more...
 
NetWORKING Strategies for Law Students and Attorneys of Color PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 02 June 2009 00:00

Networking is one of my favorite topics to discuss because there are so many misconceptions about the term Networking and how it should be done.  Networking is essentially the process of relationship building.   The purpose of building relationships is to find out information about the law school experience and practicing in the legal profession.   Effective networking can yield mentors, employers, colleagues, friends and business opportunities. 

There are many strategies and approaches to how you build relationships, but regardless of how you choose to approach it, networking should be thoughtful, constant, and a priority in the life of any legal professional.   In my interactions with many law students, attorneys and other professionals, I have noticed that many people of color don’t realize the need for networking soon enough.    Over the month of June, I will relay some effective strategies for networking that you can put to immediate use.   Let’s start at the beginning:

Register to read more...