Share This Page

About this Blogger

Julian Haffner is a partner at Richa Haffner, P.C. located in Bethesda, MD. He received his J.D. from Howard University School of Law and his B.A. from Swarthmore College. Julian counsels clients in the entertainment industry, focusing on forming and advising small to mid-sized entertainment entities, drafting and negotiating contracts related to music, television, and film, and dealing with trademark, copyright, and other intellectual property matters. His entertainment clients include recording artists, composers, music producers, music publishers, record companies, and independent film and television producers.

He can be reached at haffner@richahaffner.com

Spread the Word!

Follow on Twitter

Em Update PDF E-mail
Monday, 09 March 2009 00:00
The publishing company representing Eminem's music has lost in its suit against Universal Music. As previously mentioned in this blog, at issue was whether digital downloads are considered records sales, which command a relatively lower royalty rate, or licenses, which command a higher licensing fee. The decsion is important because had Universal lost, the decision would have provided powerful precedential effect, opening record labels to a potential flood gate of cases involving ambiguous or wholly absent provisions addressing digital distributions. Essentially the court recognized the changing landscape of the record business, and concluded that a digital download today is more akin to the sale of record than it is a license (for example use of a record in a film or TV show). To be sure, an important victory for a beleagured record industry that can use all the good news it can get.

 

Comments (0)add
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smaller | bigger

busy